Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Writing a Literature Review: Phase 6: Writing the Review & Bibliography

This guide provides an overview of the literature review and its place in a research project and contains resources for finding the information you need at APSU Library.

Creating a Works Cited / Bibliography

Start Smart - Use RefWorks

The Web-based bibliographic citation management tool RefWorks allows one to format a bibliography in numerous styles including APA, MLA, Turabian and Chicago.  

It is also a great place to store and organize citations for your literature review.

Excellent Writing is Essential

After you have located your literature, read it, analyzed and evaluated it, it’s time to embark on the essential next stage of actually writing it up. It’s always worthwhile to lavish care on the actual writing of your literature review.

Some tips:

  • Keep your audience in mind as you write your literature review. Your writing should be pitched at the level of expected readers. Use the terminology appropriate to them, i.e. physics terms for physicists; sociology terms for sociologists.
  • If you are writing for the ordinary reader, avoid all jargon. Generally, "plain English" is the best strategy.
  • It’s usually a good idea to keep your paragraphs short.
  • Subheadings should be used to clarify the structure. They break up the material into more readable units as well as give the reader a place to "dive in" if she doesn't want to read all of the material.
  • It’s often a good idea to write the first draft straight through and quickly – this can help preserve continuity and give coherence. Once you have text down on paper (or on a computer) it’s often far easier to make needed revisions.
  • Some common errors include:
    • a failure to focus by going off on tangents;
    • failure to cite essential pertinent studies;
    • failure to maintain a coherent, logical flow;
    • weak organization;
    • poor language, grammar etc.
  • Use direct quotation sparingly and judiciously. Paraphrasing writers' works is often preferable to quoting direct passages.
  • Be prudent in the number of studies you discuss and cite. Referring to almost everything on the subject is useless.
  • Don't cite references that you haven't read.
  • A review is NOT a group of linked abstracts, one per paragraph.


At the end of the review the reader, captivated by both the style and content, should be able to declare: “This is precisely the study that must be carried out now to advance the needed research in this field.”

Subject Guide

Michael Hooper's picture
Michael Hooper
Contact:
Library 117
931-221-7092